Evaluation

Idea

We still believe that the idea we came up with was a good idea. We tried to make it as interactive and fun as we could have in the time frame. There was a moment in the project where we started to think that our idea was to ambitious but we think the final product came out very well, better then we all expected it to.

Group work

We work very well as a group. Everyone went the extra mile to get this project done on time. People were always available when we needed them and were willing to stay late (as a couple of times we were in uni till 10pm). We could also relay on everyone to get their own parts done. Which was good because when it came to putting the whole thing together it made it a lot easier then if everyone hadn't done their own part. We were also able to get hold of everyone very easy. So if anything happened at the last minute, it was good that we could communicate. We also helped each other out with any problems that we came across.

Interactivity

I believe our interactivity was good. It is very easy to use and could be very enjoyable. The video could have been more interactivehowever i believe that it is fit for purpose. We could have done more on the clickable clues but with our time frame it just was not possible.

What worked?

The fact we are all friends and get on together really well helped when it came to doing the team work because we were spending so much time together it made it easier that we all knew each other. It also helped that we were all very committed to the project, we all wanted to get a good grade. So this meant that we all put the same amount of effort into the project.

What didn't work?

Lukas is going home on 30th March so this meant that we would have to be ready to present the week before everyone else. Having a shorter deadline did give the feeling that everything was a bit more rushed and that we all had to work up to the last min to finish the project to the standard we wanted it. But the overall standard of the video is very impressive for the amount of time we had.

What was good?

We believe that the interactivity of the video was the one thing that went very well. It really came together at the end. For a moment we thought that we would not be able to produce what we wanted to due to lack of time and technical skills. But thanks to a couple of all nighters and lots of hard work we were able to get produce finished and working smoothly.

What was not so good?

We could have expanded on the clues, we could make them more interactive and elaborate. This would however taken more time.